Research paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 5

Research paper - Essay Example Content sharing can also involve exchanging opinions and ideas among individuals from a particular community. The first reason the government is against the act of sharing ideas and contents through the internet is because of matters that pertain to national security. The internet can present an avenue in which to extremists can use to spread their extremist propaganda, which can be detrimental to national security. To avoid raising suspicion, extremists may pose as normal bloggers or social networkers, but subtly spread dangerous propaganda (Martin 72). The second reason that makes the government work towards taking control of information sharing in the internet is because of terrorists. Since tracking communication on various blogs and social networks is a hard task, at times, terrorist can use this weakness to coordinate with their counterparts in different regions around the world to commit terrorist attacks in an area. The government has to minimize this act through taking control of information sharing in the internet (Martin 73). The third reason that makes the government control sharing of information is to ensure good moral behaviors are observed. The internet can promote a behavior in which individuals sharing contents can go to the extent of sharing nude photos and videos. This immoral act has been on the increase because of advanced technology that has resulted in an easy way of taking photos and videos, which are later uploaded in the internet (Martin 73). In conclusion, the government aims to control sharing of ideas and contents in the internet in order to protect the public from extremists, terrorist and sharing of explicit contents. Extremist and terrorists pose threat to national security while sharing explicit contents promotes immoral and unethical

Organization of the module Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Organization of the module - Assignment Example In addition, it relates to my academic achievement as demonstrated in each theory. Larsen and Ellehave (2000:104) give a definition of the term ‘career’ and its components. They define it to be a development process where an individual through personal experiences and interaction with an organization is able to establish prosperity grounds. The scholars further explain that the term ‘career’ is composed of two components; the objective and the subjective components. Their interaction creates a far much bigger body, difficult to disentangle. Basically, career theories can be split into two; traditional and modern. The traditional theory talks about the vertical rise of employees up the ladder career ladder in terms of job position they hold in their workplace.1 Most people still embrace this concept as they see it to be orderly. It allows recognition of abilities and promotions are done based on the capability expressed by the employee. While working in Kuwait finance House bank, I was able to move from a customer service representative to a banking clerk and later to a senior banking clerk between 2004 and 2007. Through self-management and ensuring quality in the work I delivered, my performance was outstanding and soon, I was able to quickly scale the ladders. As evident from my development plan, my scholarly advancement was aimed at advantaging me whenever there was a better job opening. This was in line with my career path of becoming competent in the field of finance. However, the number of promising ladders has ke pt diminishing and you find that regardless of how much effort one puts while expecting promotion, this does not happen all the time. Economic change as a result of globalization and technological advancement has led organizations to seek other flexible forms. (Rifkin 1995) and (Bridges 1995) argue about the end of jobs and work. Watts (1996) argues that there’s